Health And YogaYogaYoga Community- Teacher, Jobs & ToolsYoga Products - Yoga Mats, Yoga VideosYoga Retreats & HolidaysYoga Reading, Yoga Articles, Yoga Books..Yoga Teacher Training Worldwide
Physiology of Meditation Techniques   |   Physiology of Pranayama   |   Yoga For Rehabilitation   |   Yoga in Perception and Performance   |   Therapeutic Applications of Yoga

 
Oxygen Consumption During Pranayamic Type Slow-Rate Breathing
 
Alterations of AEPs During Yogic Breathing and Attentive State if Mind
 
Breathing Through a Nostril can alter Metabolism and Autonomic Activities
 
Physiological Measures of Right Nostril Breathing
 
Effect Two Yogic Breathing Techniques on Heart Rate Variability
 
Recording of the Endosomatic Sympathetic Skin Response
 
Letter 1
 
Letter 2
 
Letter 3
 
Letter 4
 
Letter 5

 
RESULTS


Effects of Surya Anuloma Viloma Pranayama (right nostril breathing or ‘S’ group) and Nadisuddhi Pranayama (alternate nostril breathing or ‘N’ group): The ‘S’ group showed a statistically significant (P<0.05, Wilcoxan’s paired signed rank test) increase of 37% in baseline levels of oxygen consumption. However, the ‘N’ group did not show such a significant change (i.e. a 19%, non-significant increase was observed).

Both groups showed a comparable and significant reduction in body weight ranging from 4.2 to 5.1%, (P<0.001, Wilcoxan’s paired signed rank test). Also, both groups showed a significant increase in heart rate at the end of a month (P<0.001, Wilcoxan’s paired-signed ranks test). The volar galvanic skin resistance (GSR) and respiratory rate did not alter in either group (Table 1).

Effects of Chandra Anuloma Viloma Pranayama (Left nostril breathing or ‘C’ group) and Nadisuddhi Pranayama (alternate nostril breathing or ‘N’ group) : Both ‘C’ and ‘N’ groups showed an increase in baseline oxygen consumption (by 24% and 17%, respectively), though this was not statistically significant for either group (P>0.01, Wilcoxan’s paired signed rank test).

Table I. This table gives a summary of the effects of ‘S’ Group and ‘N” Group pranayamas.
 

Values are mean + S.E.M. (Standard error of mean). Statistical significance of final values has been indicated with asterisks, as follows: * = P < 0.05. ** = P < 0.001. Wilcoxan’s non-parametric paired signed rank test.
 
Table II: This table gives a summary of the effects of ‘C’ Group and ‘N’ Group pranayama
Values are Mean ± S.E.M. (Standard error of mean). Statistical significance of final values comared with initial values has been indicated with asterisks as follows: * = P < 0.05, ** = P < 0.001, Wilcoxan’s non - parametric paired signed rank test
 

The ‘C’ group showed a statistically significant increase, in volar galvanic skin resistance (CSR), (P<0.05, Wilcoxan’s paired signed rank test). In contrast the ‘N’ group did not show such a change. In contrast, the ‘N’ group showed a significant increase in heart rate (P<0.001) while the ‘C’ group did not change. Both groups showed a comparable (ranging from 3.8 to 2.6%) and significant (P<0.05, Wilcoxan’s paired signed rank test) reduction in body weight. Neither group showed change in respiratory rate (Table II).

  
 

All Research Papers are published online courtesy www.vyasa.org

You do not have permission to sell or distribute or reproduce Health and Yoga ResearchPapers text or any portion of the text in any form (printed, electronic or otherwise). To do so is a violation of copyright law
Read More...

Research Contributions of
SVYASA
(2 Volumes)
PRINT EDITION
US $ 33.00
Click here to Buy


Apply for
PhD
at
VYASA
Click here